IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpe/papers/ineqqc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inequality, quasi-concavity, and gradual population shifts

Author

Listed:
  • Kristof Bosmans

Abstract

An income distribution is a mixture of two given income distributions if the relative frequency it associates with each income level is a convex combination of the relative frequencies associated with it by the given two income distributions——e.g., the income distribution of a country is obtained as a mixture of the income distributions of its regions. In this article, it is established that all inequality measures commonly considered in the literature——the class of decomposable inequality measures and the class of normative inequality measures based on a social welfare function of the rank-dependent expected utility form——satisfy quasi-concavity properties, which imply, loosely speaking, that mixing income distributions increases inequality. These quasi-concavity properties are then shown to greatly reduce the possible patterns describing the evolution of inequality in the overall income distribution (a mixture) during a process in which population gradually shifts from one of its constituent income distributions to another over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristof Bosmans, 2006. "Inequality, quasi-concavity, and gradual population shifts," Public Economics Working Paper Series ineqqc, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Working Group Public Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpe:papers:ineqqc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality; Mixture; Quasi-concavity; Rank-dependent expected utility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpe:papers:ineqqc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristof Bosmans (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cekulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.