IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Criteria to Evaluate Voting Indicators and a Recipe for a New One

Listed author(s):
  • Loek Groot

This paper is made up of two interrelated parts. Part I contains a critical evaluation of the so called StemWijzer 2002, an internet application that helped and advised voters which political party to choose at the Dutch, German and Suisse parliamentary elections. Applying some validity tests and checking the discriminatory power, it is argued that the StemWijzer 2002 is seriously flawed. Part II is devoted to designing an interactive voting indicator, where the propositions to be evaluated by the voter depends on his responses to other propositions at an earlier stage. The viability of such an indicator hinges on the possibility to determine the partisanship leaning (leftist or rightist) of voters by means of a limited number of questions. For this purpose a rather minimalist voting indicator (the VoteFork) was developed. The empirical results show that it is indeed possible to ascertain for the majority of voters whether they belong to left-wing or right-wing parties. In this part I also present a simple model which can be used as a benchmark to assess the quality of voting indicators, where quality is simply defined as the fraction of correct voting advises. This paper is pioneering in the sense that yet no serious attention is paid to voting indicators in general, to the criteria they should ideally meet and to the possibility to make them interactive. Comments are welcome.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Public Economics with number 0311001.

in new window

Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: 14 Nov 2003
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0311001
Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on Win98; pages: 26; figures: 2
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0311001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.