IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Preferencias inciertas y modelo Spike en la valoración del patrimonio natural

Listed author(s):
  • José María Casado García

    (Agri-food Research & Technology Center)

  • Jesus Barreiro

    (University of Palencia)

  • Luis Perez y Perez

    (Agri-food Research & Technology Center)

Under the Spanish conservation law, compensation is envisaged for the damage associated with all actions that reduce the quantity or quality of protected areas and species. This paper provides a tool to evaluate the monetary equivalent of this damage. First, we conduct a contingent valuation exercise to estimate the existence value related to protected areas and species in Aragon. This first estimate is then reconsidered including in first place the possibility of zero bids and also the possibility of uncertain preferences for non familiar goods. Considering these two effects, mean values are reduced dramatically (more than halved) giving support to previous recommendations of dividing by two contingent valuation estimates from dichotomous choice question formats.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Microeconomics with number 0403002.

in new window

Length: 42 pages
Date of creation: 23 Mar 2004
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0403002
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 42
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0403002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.