Understanding the 1994 Election: Still No Realignment
The change in the composition of Congress resulting from the 1994 election was viewed by some Republicans as a "triumph of conservatism over the perceived abuses of liberalism." In this working paper, Resident Scholar Oren M. Levin-Waldman examines polling data to explore whether the rejection of Congressional incumbents was a function of their perceived corruption or a desire to elect representatives whose ideology better reflected those of the electorate. Levin-Waldman analyzes polling results in the context of two models that might explain the results of the 1994 election: a traditional model in which incumbents are rejected for failing to deliver on their campaign promises, and a realignment model that explains the rejection as an episode in a more general pattern of political realignment. Realignment, as defined originally in the political science literature, is marked by a "critical" election in which voter turnout is high, results represent a sharp change in the previous composition between parties, a restructuring occurs along party lines at all levels of government, and the results persist over a long period of time. Realignments, then, represent systemic changes in American politics. Subsequent modifications of the model have created some ambiguity in appraising whether realignment might be occurring. Such modifications allow realignments to occur over time (instead of in a sudden shift) as a gradual decline in long-term party loyalty. A problem arises in distinguishing between a "critical" election, that is, a change in party identification, and a one-time rejection of a party's candidates. Realignments occur when an issue or issues polarizes the voters significantly enough to motivate them to change party affiliation. The magnitude of realignment depends on the scope of the grievance, the extent to which the proposed remedy is resisted, the motivation and capacity of the party's leadership, the degree of the division between the parties, and the degree to which voters are attached to their current party.
|Date of creation:||29 Sep 1998|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 43; figures: included|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9809014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.