IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Growth Cycles in Centrally Planned Economies: An Empirical Test

Listed author(s):
  • Oldrich Kyn

    (Boston University)

  • Jiri Slama

    (Osteuropa Institut, Muenchen)

  • Wolfram Schrettl

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

For some time Marxist economists believed that central planning as applied in the Soviet-type economies could prevent cyclical fluctuation. This view, however changed, when in 1960’s it became quite obvious, that some type of cycle is generated in centrally planned economies as well. Because the mechanism of functioning is different than in market economies, the existing theories of business cycle do not apply. This paper provides empirical tests of the recently developed theories of socialist “growth cycles” or “quasi-cycles”, using data for Czechoslovakia. Two theories of “investment cycles” were tested. The first one, formulated by Oskar Lange was based on the idea that the large amount of investment concentrated in the short time period—as happened during the industrialization in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe—would have an “reinvestment echo effect” when the obsolete physical capital needs to be replaced. The evidence from Czechoslovakia very clearly demonstrates, that although the need for increased reinvestments may have contributed, it could not have been the main cause of the recessions in economic growth in early 50’ and 60’s. The second theory formulated by Josef Goldman blames the cyclical fluctuations on the very long gestation period between planners’ decisions to invest and the introduction of the newly constructed capital into production. The empirical evidence shows that the average time lag in the investment process is much shorter than ten years that would be needed for this theory to be valid. Finally, a new theory is formulated and empirically tested. It attributes the cycles to a peculiar behavior of the planners, who plan the future growth rates of the economy on the basis of their observation of the actual growth rates in the past.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Macroeconomics with number 0511003.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Nov 2005
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0511003
Note: Type of Document - doc
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0511003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.