Refuting the Trade Deficit Rationale
This article provides a defense of a sentence lifted from the Final Report of the United States Trade Deficit Review Commission. 'The savings shortfall argument falsely presumes that causation goes from savings to the trade deficit'. The savings shortfall argument is support by nothing more than reasoning by analogy from the pre-trade closed economy. The equation Savings equal Investment plus the Trade Deficit cannot be reasonably interprepted as a closed system. Factors outside this equation control the level of both investment and the trade deficit. I support my position by reviewiing in detail the way the Capital Account is calculated, to show that the Current Account Balance controls the level of the Capital Account. I also review the role of the stock market in transferring wealth from the business sector to the personal sector, effectively making irrelevant the low level of savings as reported by the National Income and Product Accounts.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0407012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.