IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Production Effects of Agri-environmental Policy Measures: Reconciling Trade and Environmental Objectives


  • Peter Walkenhorst



In addition to generating commodity outputs, agricultural production activities affect water, air, and soil quality, influence eco-systems and biodiversity, and shape rural landscapes. Many of these environmental effects exhibit the characteristics of negative or positive externalities or public goods, for which private markets do not exist or are poorly functioning. OECD countries implement a variety of agri-environmental policy measures with the aim of addressing the environmental effects associated with agricultural production. Policy measures include regulations and taxes to contain or prevent environmental harm, information and training programmes to promote environmentally friendly farming practices, and payments that remunerate farmers for environmental services they provide. Over the past 10-15 years, the scope and complexity of agri environmental policies has increased, not least because of growing concerns of society for the state of the environment. In parallel to the rising importance of agri- environmental considerations, agricultural trade policy reforms, in particular through policy changes following the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, have gradually opened domestic agricultural markets to international competition. Trade barriers, export subsidies, and domestic support have been bound and are being scaled down. In this context of greater international interdependence, there are two related policy debates on the possible impact of environmental standards, programmes, and payments on agricultural production and trade. The first is concerned with the impact of differences of agri-environmental regulations among countries on agricultural production costs and farm competitiveness, and the second with the issue whether and to what extent domestic agri-environmental policies influence international trade. The two policy debates do not have the same prominence in all OECD countries, and in some countries the underlying issues are seen to be of no relevance at all. Yet, the discussions have the potential to influence negotiations on agricultural trade and the environment at the international level. This paper examines several related questions: What are the effects of agri environmental policy measures on agricultural trade? To what extent do agri environmental regulations influence farming costs and international competitiveness? Would an international harmonisation of agri environmental policies increase welfare? Which characteristics might policy measures have to possess in order to be considered minimally trade distorting?

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Walkenhorst, 2004. "Production Effects of Agri-environmental Policy Measures: Reconciling Trade and Environmental Objectives," International Trade 0401011, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0401011
    Note: Type of Document - pdf

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Mary Bohman & Patricia J. Lindsey, 1997. "Divergent Environmental Regulations and Trade Liberalization," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 45(1), pages 17-38, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Trade and environment; regulations; payments; competitiveness; harmonisation; WTO green box;

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0401011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.