IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Scientific prestige of the Spanish Economic journals. Professors' working habits in the Economics' departments of the public Spanish universities

  • Adelaida Román

    (CINDOC-CSIC)

  • Elea Giménez

    (CINDOC-CSIC)

Registered author(s):

    This paper analyzes the data from a questionnaire mailed to professors in the Economics' departments of the Spanish public universities about their working habits as to information sources used and journals where they used to publish. Responses received indicate two main dimensions of journals' reputation: the mean values assigned to journals indicate the intensity of prestige, and the number of respondents who assigned values extent, are considered as an indicator of the extent of the journal's prestige . Differences in evaluation of journals originated by professors who had published in them are considered. Finally, opinions related to several aspects of the scientific evaluation process in general and more specifically to the scientific periodicals evaluation criteria are ennumerated.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/get/papers/0012/0012004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by EconWPA in its series General Economics and Teaching with number 0012004.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 31 pages
    Date of creation: 19 Jan 2001
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0012004
    Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on HP; pages: 31 ; figures: included. We never published this work. It shows the most important results from a research project on scientific journals' evaluation.
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://128.118.178.162

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0012004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.