IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Audit Market Deregulation on the Pricing of Brand Name Reputation


  • Allen T. Craswell

    (University of Sydney)

  • Jere R. Francis

    (University of Missouri)

  • Stephen L. Taylor

    (University of Sydney)


Between 1982 and 1987, the Australian audit market experienced an increase in price competition resulting from changes in professional rules governing advertising and marketing practices as well as the introduction of widespread audit tendering. Because these changes are generally assumed to have reduced any alleged ability of the Big Eight to earn oligopoly profits, they provide an opportunity to test alternative explanations for the observed Big Eight audit-fee premia. If the market was not competitive, the Big Eight premium may be the result of market imperfections and the changes in professional rules could be expected to lead to a decline in the premia. Alternatively, if the market was competitive and the premia were attributable to product differentiation, it would be sustainable notwithstanding deregulation of the market. The initial analysis of panel data of publicly reported audit fees for a six- year period suggests that reductions in real audit fees are more marked among Big Eight clients and occur more quickly in response to a change of auditor. However, using seemingly unrelated regression it appears that structural adjustments were made to the audit-fee process and the Big Eight premium did not decline over the six year period. This result does not support allegations that Big Eight fee premia result from a relatively uncompetitive audit market.

Suggested Citation

  • Allen T. Craswell & Jere R. Francis & Stephen L. Taylor, "undated". "The Effect of Audit Market Deregulation on the Pricing of Brand Name Reputation," Working Papers 001, University of Sydney, Department of Accounting.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:syacwp:001

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:syacwp:001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.