IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Finding a Focus: Repositioning Office REITs in the 21st Century

Listed author(s):
  • Samuel Chasia
  • Akio Kishimoto
  • Bernard Kwan
  • Ronchang She
Registered author(s):

    Ever since the collapse in real estate share prices in 1998, the real estate community has been looking for a solution to the depressed share prices and capital constraints. There have been a number of quick fixes bandied about, with calls from some quarters to re-privatize some of the REITs. This had been due to the fact that the private companies had been seen to be doing rather well in the current environment, given the strength of the underlying market. However the overwhelming sentiment within the office sector has been that the advantages of size and access to public capital far outweigh the advantages of being a C-corporation1. A large number of suggestions have been made by a number of REITs in the field of balance sheet management and in trying to grow ancillary revenues to take advantage of the recent passage of the REIT Modernization Act ("RMA"). But in this paper we would like to argue that there are no quick fixes for the REIT industry. A framework will be provided to show that there are four value drivers that will help to enhance shareholder value, but at the end of the day there is no real substitute for the basics such as management expertise, a clean balance sheet and above all, a focused strategy. In this paper we shall use also explode a number of myths about the REIT industry, such as the common assertion that greater size is naturally better, and that the provision of broadband technology and other ancillary revenues will make substantial impacts upon the bottom line of these REITs. The conclusions will become readily apparent when we analyze our two case studies in the office sector -- Equity Office Properties and SL Green Realty. Although the collapse in real estate prices affected all the REITs equally in 1998, making no distinction in terms of individual companies, we have since seen a separation in 1999. This separation has been in very much in terms of the quality of the underlying REITs. Those REITs with a strong management team, low leverage and above all a focused growth strategy have seen share price out-performance. We labeled these REITs "Blue Chip REITs." The second class of REITs we labeled "Index REITs". Their size and diversification make them a core holding for any investors who want exposure to the sector, but whose size inhibit their ability to grow. Finally there have been what we have termed the "Laggards" -- REITs who had overstretched themselves and had been struggling with over-leverage. The challenge in this paper has been to try to reposition quality REITs into the "Blue Chip" category by highlighting a framework of value drivers. But we also wish to make the case that the most important of these value drivers is having a focused strategy, with which to differentiate oneself from ones peers. Companies that have shown a targeted growth strategy, that have leveraged core competencies have seen share price out-performance. 1 The Future of REITs, Part III

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Wharton School Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center, University of Pennsylvania in its series Zell/Lurie Center Working Papers with number 364.

    in new window

    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:wop:pennzl:364
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    256 South 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6330

    Phone: 215.898.9687
    Fax: 215.573.2220
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:pennzl:364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.