IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Revival of the New Deal Coalition? Social Groups and Political Change in the 1990s


  • Jeff Manza
  • Clem Brooks


In this study we ask whether, and in what ways, the impact of social cleavages in American politics changed in the unusual 1996 presidential election. Has the pattern of alignment of key social groups remained constant in the 1990s? Have over-time trends observed in earlier years (and analyzed in our earlier work) continue in 1996? And what bearing do the causal factors identified by researchers as explaining elections in the 1990¹s ­ economic voting and the importance of "new" policy conflicts relating to gender and family ­ have on cleavage voting? While single elections provide insufficient grounds for asserting the existence of new trends, the results of our analyses have unearthed two developments that represent dramatic extensions of past trends. The deepening of the gender cleavage confirms our earlier finding about the importance of labor force participation in shifting women voters towards the Democrats. But, since labor force participation can account for only a portion of the increase in the gender gap since 1992, other causal factors are at work. Second, there was a sharp decline in the class cleavage between 1992 and 1996. This is primarily the result of nonskilled workers¹ partisan dealignment during this election. Additional analysis provides evidence that nonskilled workers continue to report disproportionate economic hardship under Democratic administrations (while also failing to return to earlier, higher levels of welfare state support in comparison with other classes). There are thus grounds for expecting that this development will continue into the foreseeable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Manza & Clem Brooks, "undated". "Revival of the New Deal Coalition? Social Groups and Political Change in the 1990s," IPR working papers 99-8, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:99-8

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:99-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.