IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/98-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Challenging Instruction for "All Students": Policy, Practitioners, and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • James P. Spillane

Abstract

"All students" is a prominent headline in recent instructional reforms as professional associations and federal and state policy-makers argue for more academically rigorous instruction for all students. In this paper, the author analyzes these reform aspirations from the perspective of reformers and from the perspective of practitioners in four schools. Spillane explores what local teachers and administrators make of these proposals, especially for students who have traditionally not succeeded in school. Based on this analysis, he argues that to understand teachers' and administrators' response to policies that challenge the conventional wisdom about poor students, it is necessary to understand how their beliefs about these students are situated in a network or web of beliefs including beliefs about teaching, learning, and classroom management: This network of beliefs supports local inattention to reform proposals that advance a more intellectually challenging curriculum for all students.

Suggested Citation

  • James P. Spillane, "undated". "Challenging Instruction for "All Students": Policy, Practitioners, and Practice," IPR working papers 98-5, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.