IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/97-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Organization of Lawyers' Work: Hemispheres, Tectonic Plate Movements, and Continental Drift

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Heinz
  • Robert L. Nelson
  • Edward O. Laumann
  • Ethan Michelson

Abstract

This paper compares findings from two surveys of Chicago lawyers, the first conducted in 1975 and the second in 1995. The earlier study indicated that the Chicago bar was then divided into two broad sectors or "hemispheres," one serving corporations and other large organizations and a second serving individuals and small businesses. Analyses of the structure of co-practice of the fields of law in 1975 and in 1995 indicate that the hemispheres are now less distinct. The fields are less tightly connected and less clearly organized--they became more highly specialized during the intervening 20 years, and are now organized in smaller clusters. Clear indications of continuing separation of work by client-type remain, however. Estimates of the amount of lawyers' time devoted to each of the fields in 1975 and 1995 indicate that corporate practice fields now consume a larger share of Chicago lawyers' attention, while fields such as probate receive a declining percentage. Growth is most pronounced in the litigation fields, especially in business litigation. At the same time, the mean size of Chicago law firms represented in the samples increased from 27 in 1975 to 141 in 1995. The management structures of the firms have evolved from traditional hierarchies into various forms displaying characteristics of bureaucracy or formal rationality.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Heinz & Robert L. Nelson & Edward O. Laumann & Ethan Michelson, "undated". "The Organization of Lawyers' Work: Hemispheres, Tectonic Plate Movements, and Continental Drift," IPR working papers 97-23, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.