IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/96-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Market for Equity Markets: The Classification and Regulation of Automated Trading Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Domowitz
  • Ruben Lee

Abstract

The growth in automated trading systems has been explosive, and regulatory initiatives and analysis with respect to this new form of financial market structure quickly followed. We analyze the use of the definition of an ÒexchangeÓ for the purpose of classification and regulation of automated trading systems, and the accompanying statutory distinction between exchanges and brokers who operate such systems. The definition and this distinction have operated for over 60 years in the United States, and underpin the entire fabric of the regulatory structure governing the American securities markets. We argue that the evolution of the definition, combined with technological advances in trading system technology, has produced inconsistencies in regulatory policy, and that the exchange/broker distinction is no longer viable. Alternative approaches to the regulation of systems are examined. We propose and analyze a strategy composed of the separation of the regulation of market structure from the regulation of other areas of public concern, and the employment of competition policy to regulate market structure. A central implication of such an approach is that there should be no distinction in the regulation of market structure issues between institutions now classified as exchanges and those that are now classified as broker-operated trading systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Domowitz & Ruben Lee, "undated". "The Market for Equity Markets: The Classification and Regulation of Automated Trading Systems," IPR working papers 96-19, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.