IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/96-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In Defense of "Descriptive" Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Mansbridge

Abstract

In "descriptive representation," representatives are in some sense typical of the larger class of persons to which they belong. When substantive interest representation is the aim, descriptive representation may accomplish those goals better than other forms in three contexts: 1)communication between non-mirror representatives and constituents is impaired by distrust, 2) important substantive interests are relatively uncrystalized at the time of the election, and 3) descriptive representatives are more likely than others aggressively to pursue group-related interests. When a group has historically suffered status disparagements reflected in a lower citizenship, descriptive representation can also serve another function, unconnected with substantive interest representation, of changing the social meaning of membership in that group.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Mansbridge, "undated". "In Defense of "Descriptive" Representation," IPR working papers 96-18, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.