IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/00-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Extended is the Extended African-American Family? The Case of Family Caregiving to Older African-Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Peggye Dilworth-Anderson
  • Sharon Wallace Williams
  • Paula Goodwin
  • Theresa Cooper

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify, describe, and explain extended family caregiving networks that African-American families use to provide care to elderly family members. The extended network was conceptualized to include four dimensions: different kinds of kin and non-kin, different types of caregivers, a caregiver substitution process, and different caregiving structures. This study used a probability sample of 330 caregivers that included 187 primary caregivers that were connected to 79 secondary caregivers, and 49 tertiary caregivers. Fifteen tertiary-only caregivers that were not connected to other caregivers were also in the study. These caregivers provided care to 202 older African-Americans. Caregivers wer mostly blood kin, some chosen kin, and a few non-kin. More than 80% of all caregivers indicated a need to have caregiver substitutes available in the network. The availability of caregiver substitutes was greatest for primary caregivers as compared to other caregivers. Caregivers created distinct caregiving structures that were primarily collectivist as opposed to individualistic. These structures included (1) primary, secondary, and tertiary, (2) primary and secondary, (3) primary and tertiary; (4) primary only, (5) tertiary-only.

Suggested Citation

  • Peggye Dilworth-Anderson & Sharon Wallace Williams & Paula Goodwin & Theresa Cooper, "undated". "How Extended is the Extended African-American Family? The Case of Family Caregiving to Older African-Americans," IPR working papers 00-3, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:00-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:00-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.