IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa15p1718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Counterfactual model for labour market evaluation policies

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Colombo
  • Mario Mezzanzanica
  • Giampaolo Montaletti
  • Gloria Ronzoni

Abstract

This paper presents the methodological approach used to analyse and assess an active labour market policy called Dote Unica del Lavoro (DUL) implemented by the Lombardy Region with reference to the period October 2013-June 2014 and addressed to 25 thousand beneficiaries. The aim of the project is to assess and quantify the efficiency of the policy measured by the labour market outcomes of the beneficiaries. The methodology is based on the counterfactual non experimental approach using the Propensity Score Matching technique. The technique is based on the comparison of the outcomes of two groups of individuals: beneficiaries and non beneficiaries (i.e. exposed and non exposed in the terminology of medical treatment) of the public employment policy. The key point is the identification and selection of the group of non beneficiaries (non exposed) that ideally should share the same features and characteristics of the beneficiaries (exposed) so that the change in outcome of the beneficiaries (if detected) can be attributed to the policy and not to other confounding factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Colombo & Mario Mezzanzanica & Giampaolo Montaletti & Gloria Ronzoni, 2015. "Counterfactual model for labour market evaluation policies," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1718, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa15p1718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa15/e150825aFinal01719.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa15p1718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.