IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

EU lagging regions investing in learning mobility: risk of further regional polarization?

Listed author(s):
  • Enrico Orrù


Registered author(s):

    This research claims that investing European Union (EU) Structural Funds in Learning Mobility (LM) might lead to further regional polarization. LM is a type of labour mobility finalized to acquire new knowledge (human capital) and social networks (social capital). Historically, LM has been supported by space neutral policies, like the ERASMUS programme. However, after the mid-tem review of the Lisbon strategy (2005), also Cohesion Policy started to invest in LM and today it is considered an important priority by 1/3 of European Social Fund national programming documents (EU, 2010i). This, even though there is no evidence of LM being consistent with the historical objective of Cohesion Policy: real convergence (Molle, 2007). Human capital theory predicts investment in education to improve labour market outputs. However, when it comes to lagging regions this might not be the case both because of brain drain (Becker, 1964) and because of their inefficient labour markets (Rodríguez-Pose and Vilalta-Bufí, 2005) . In order to shed light on these issues, this paper relies on a case study: the programme Master and Back (M&B). M&B is an early example of Structural Funds devoted to learning mobility and has been carried out since 2005 by the Italian region Sardinia. It consists of financing young Sardinian residents endowed with excellent CVs to take masters and PhDs in the best world universities and then of facilitating their return by means of economic incentives. In order to evaluate the impact of the programme, the labour market outputs of the recipients have been compared to those of a suitable control group by means of Propensity Score Matching (Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1983). In particular, the following outputs have been considered: odds of employment, earnings and odds of emigration. Both administrative data and web survey data have been collected. Overall 207 treated units and 1,201 control units have participated to the survey, corresponding respectively to 50% and 20% of response rate. The results show that M&B has had no significant effect neither on odds of employment nor on earnings, while it seems to have increased the odds of emigration. These findings imply that lagging regions should be very careful when investing in learning mobility and that EU Cohesion Policy should pay more attention to the risks of further regional polarization.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa12p402.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Oct 2012
    Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p402
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria

    Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.