Europe 2020 Strategy, Cohesion Policy and Greek Regions: Are we â€œsmartâ€ enough?
Since the beginning of 2010, European Commission has launched the new strategic framework for Europe, which is now known as the â€œEurope 2020 Strategyâ€ . This new strategy has been set as the successor of the so called â€œLisbon-Gothenburg Strategyâ€ which was set in early â€™00 as the strategy for Europe in the 21st century. Actually the two strategies have a lot in common. The main driving forces of Europe still remain the same and some rearrangement in the EU-wide strategic targets has been made. Of course the economic crisis that has emerged forced for a new priority that was set in the â€œEU 2020â€ strategy, but the main targeting still encompasses the three corners of the well known sustainability triangle, namely economy, environment and society. The setting of a new strategy arises some questions. Why does Europe need a new development strategy? Was the old strategy successful or not? Was every country in Europe adapted in the old strategy properly? Where there any problems in the implementation of the old strategy? What was the overall outcome of the old strategy in EU Level, in each Member State and in the regions of Europe? Is the new strategy better adjusted to cope with the development problems in European, national and regional level? Furthermore, European Commission has already asked MS to comply with the specifications of the â€œEurope 2020 Strategyâ€ in the planning and implementation of the Cohesion Policyâ€™s programs in the following years (for the remaining of the 2007 â€“ 2013 period and especially for the 2014-2020 period). This article discusses the above questions and tries to find answers on the rationale and prospects of the new strategy. Also, in a second step we give more emphasis in Greece and Greek Regions that have been not well adapted in the â€œLisbon Strategyâ€ as shown in the recent 5th Cohesion Report and other studies. Finally, the article closes with policy recommendations regarding the consistency and interaction between the â€œEurope 2020 Strategyâ€ and Cohesion Policy, and also some policy recommendations for Greek regional policy and Greek regions.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa11p928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.