IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Stranger in the Night: Canadian Assistance to Southeastern Europe (1990-2005)


  • Asteris Huliaras



Official Development Assistance to the Balkans in the 1990-2005 period seem to reflect two different and contradictory donor ‘geopolitical visions’. Some countries (like Greece and France) tended to consider the Balkans as a homogenized ‘aid space’. On the contrary other countries (like Japan) or international organizations (like the European Union) tended to divide the Balkans into two ‘aid spaces’: the Western and the Eastern Balkans. The second ‘geopolitical vision’ led to differentiated aid policies. The Balkans were considered as being consisted of two groups of recipients: Western Balkans that received humanitarian and short-term reconstruction aid and Eastern Balkans that received more ‘developmental’ aid. In the last fifteen years the Balkans were one of the priority regions in Canada’s foreign policy. Canada’s military involvement in the Kosovo war was the largest military of the country since the Korean War. Also Canada has deployed an average of 1500-2000 peacekeepers at any given time in the Balkans and accepted more than 30.000 refugees from the region. But above all Canada provided hundreds of millions of $ for the reconstruction of the region. The paper focuses on Canada’s bilateral aid to the Balkans, examines Canada’s aid motives and attempts to identify the main differences between Canada’s aid efforts in the region and those of other OECD countries. Above all the paper analyses Canada’s regional geopolitical vision and tries to determine how its adoption influenced aid policy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Asteris Huliaras, 2006. "A Stranger in the Night: Canadian Assistance to Southeastern Europe (1990-2005)," ERSA conference papers ersa06p21, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p21

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.