Author
Abstract
This note emphasizes the urgent need for development strategies beyond short-term aid to address protracted refugee crises in the Great Lakes Region (GLR). Due to major cuts to international aid, the paper advocates for integrating refugees into national social protection systems to enhance resilience, social inclusion, and socioeconomic development, reducing tensions with host communities. In fact, this note proposes a pragmatic pathway for progressive inclusion of refugees into national social protection systems, complementing not substituting humanitarian action in protracted settings. Transitioning to development programs requires legal and policy reforms, alignment with national systems, flexible financing, and regional cooperation. Challenges include increasing refugee vulnerability in regions with weak social protection systems and funding. The note proposes a layered financing model that couples domestic effort with predictable, multi-year concessional resources, disaster-risk financing and contingency mechanisms, and budget tagging to track refugee-related expenditure within government systems. Greater dialogue among governments, regional bodies, and development partners is essential to include refugees in national development plans and adapt social protection systems, considering regional approaches where appropriate. Within this context, regional cooperation should prioritize interoperability and mutual recognition (IDs, data standards, payment platforms) after foundational national reforms are in place. The note urges policies to embed social protection as a long-term solution, advocating new approaches to legal and policy reforms, innovative and flexible financing, regional refugee strategies, and data sharing. Central to this dialogue is the question of affordability. The recommended pathway reinforces government leadership, expands self-reliance and jobs linkages, safeguards data protection, and sequences reforms so that short-term humanitarian support all ow a smooth transition into government-led, fiscally responsible refugees inclusion. Burundi and the DRC exemplify successful refugee inclusion in national social protection systems.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:209058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron F Buchsbaum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.