IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wap/wpaper/2603.html

Epistemological Bases for Nash and Rationalizability Theories of Prediction/Decision-Making in Games

Author

Listed:
  • Tai-Wei Hu

    (Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK)

  • Mamoru Kaneko

    (Waseda University, Tokyo, and University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan)

Abstract

We explore the conceptual bases of the Nash (noncooperative) theory. To emphasize the conceptual issues, we compare it to the rationalizability theory. Both theories target individual ex ante prediction/decision making in a game. We pinpoint their difference in the treatment of an inside player’s prediction-making, with respect to the quantifiers “for all” and “for some”, about the other’s prediction/decision. We argue that the Nash theory follows the fundamental postulate that each player respects the other as an independent decision-maker, and that this independence is captured in the corresponding prediction/decision criterion. The rationalizability theory is based on a different conceptual base; the quantifier “for some” is highly speculative. We will discuss other conceptual bases of the Nash theory from various points of view, which suggest further developments along the line of the Nash theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai-Wei Hu & Mamoru Kaneko, 2026. "Epistemological Bases for Nash and Rationalizability Theories of Prediction/Decision-Making in Games," Working Papers 2603, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wap:wpaper:2603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.waseda.jp/fpse/winpec/assets/uploads/2026/04/E2603.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wap:wpaper:2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Haruko Noguchi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spwasjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.