IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwcrt/379901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Construing the Counterfactual

Author

Listed:
  • Kay Winkler

Abstract

Not quite three years ago, the New Zealand Supreme Court ruled that a firm can only be held to have taken advantage of its market power if a causal connection between the firms’ conduct and its market power can be established. The court’s decision, which relies on a counterfactual (‘but for’) test, has proved controversial. Critics claim that it is now easier in New Zealand than in other countries for dominant firms to abuse their market power. However, the counterfactual test may serve other purposes. Kay E Winkler puts the Court’s decision into perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay Winkler, 2013. "Construing the Counterfactual," Competition & Regulation Times 379901, New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcrt:379901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/crt/article/view/3799
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcrt:379901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.