IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vor/issues/2016-03-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effectiveness Of Social Networking Edublog For Teaching Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Rajshree Vaishnav
  • Vandana Ramteke

Abstract

The present study is aimed at finding the effectiveness of Edublog in terms of students achievement. It was an experimental study conducted on students of class 9th studying in different schools affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education of Nagpur city in the state of Maharashtra India. The researchers selected 200 students studying in two different schools and divided into two groups each comprising 100 students. The groups were labeled as Experimental group and Control group. The student of experimental group was taught through Edublog along with regular class room teaching while students of control group were taught using the traditional method of teaching for Economics subject. The pre-test was administered to students in both the groups before teaching commenced. After the treatment a post-test was administered. The data was analysed using t-test. Result revealed statistical significant effect of Edublog over traditional teaching method on academic achievement of students. Key words: Edublog, Traditional Method, Achievement, economics

Suggested Citation

  • Rajshree Vaishnav & Vandana Ramteke, 2016. "Effectiveness Of Social Networking Edublog For Teaching Economics," Working papers 2016-03-03, Voice of Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2016-03-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://voiceofresearch.org/Doc/Mar-2016/Mar-2016_3.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    edublog; traditional method; achievement; economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2016-03-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Avdhesh Jha (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.