IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vnm/notric/26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stigmatizzati, ma Perché? Come il Settore Cooperativo Ha Reagito in Risposta allo Scandalo di Mafia Capitale

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Maiolini

    (John Cabot University)

  • Francesca Capo

    (Università degli studi di Milano Bicocca)

  • Tommaso Ramus

    (ESSEC Business School)

  • Francesco Rullani

    (Dipartimento di Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)

Abstract

Lo studio analizza l'impatto dello scandalo noto come Mafia Capitale sul sistema cooperativo sociale italiano e come tale scandalo si è diffuso rapidamente in tutto il settore cooperativo. La ricerca evidenzia i meccanismi attraverso i quali il settore ha combattuto tale stigma. I risultati mostrano come un lavoro istituzionale di tipo difensivo abbia avviato un processo di “revisione” degli obiettivi e dei valori fondanti del sistema cooperativo. Tale revisione ha, infatti, portato le cooperative a discutere all’interno del loro sistema di come operazionalizzare tali valori in pratiche e modelli operativi in grado di rispondere alla stigmatizzazione.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Maiolini & Francesca Capo & Tommaso Ramus & Francesco Rullani, 2022. "Stigmatizzati, ma Perché? Come il Settore Cooperativo Ha Reagito in Risposta allo Scandalo di Mafia Capitale," Note di Ricerca 04, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    • Handle: RePEc:vnm:notric:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wwwt.unive.it/web/fileadmin/user_upload/dipartimenti/DMAN/pubblicazioni_scientifiche/note_di_ricerca/2011_2024/2022nr04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vnm:notric:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daria Arkhipova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mdvenit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.