IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Anglo-Saxon versus the Continental European Corporate Governance Model: Empirical Evidence of Board Composition in Belgium


  • Hubert Ooghe


  • Veerle De Vuyst

    (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School)


In this paper, two corporate governance models have been compared - the Anglo-Saxon and the Continental European models. These corporate governance models differ strongly, and the differences are mainly due to differences in the business context. The problems arising from separation of ownership from control will thus have to be solved through different mechanisms. One important mechanism is the board of directors. The board composition of 122 companies has been analyzed in a Belgian empirical study. From the tests, we found a significant positive relationship between the number of directors in the board and a range of other factors: the size of the company; its nationality; whether the company is listed or not; and the sector in which the company is operating. Only shareholder structure has no effect on the size of the board. The second variable affecting the composition of the board is the percentage of external directors. We found that the number of external directors differs significantly between companies with a different nationality and between companies that are listed or not. The size, the shareholder structure and the sector were not related to the percentage of external directors in a company. Keywords: corporate governance, board composition

Suggested Citation

  • Hubert Ooghe & Veerle De Vuyst, 2001. "The Anglo-Saxon versus the Continental European Corporate Governance Model: Empirical Evidence of Board Composition in Belgium," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2001-6, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
  • Handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2001-6

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Ariff & J. Ratnatunga, 2008. "Do Accounting And Finance Tools Serve Governance?," CARF F-Series CARF-F-127, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:259-277 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2001-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Isabelle Vandenbroere). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.