IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ver/wpaper/11-2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-based Investments Products (PRIIP) - Scenari di performance con traiettorie alla Cornish-Fisher

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Aquino

    (University of Verona, Department of Economics, Master Degree in Banking and Finance)

  • Francesco Rossi

    (Department of Economics (University of Verona))

  • Matteo Tesser

    (Fairmat Srl, Verona)

Abstract

The European Regulation n° 1286 of November 26, 2014 (PRIIPs regulation) will be effective from January 1st 2018 and will oblige products manufactures to produce a three-page document (the Key Investment Document or KID) for several products categories offered to retail investors. In 2020 the KID will also replace the KIID currently compulsory for UCITS funds. One of the key points intro-duced in the new regulatory document is the presence of ex-ante performance scenarios while in the KIID only past performances are represented. In this article, the methodology proposed in the level II of the RTS is analysed and backtested. In par-ticular, the aspect of the European legislator's willingness to quantify the expected returns of invest-ment in four market conditions - stress, unfavourable, moderate and favourable - and two variants of the model proposed by the European Commission were tested and compared with a model based on the simple normality of returns by adopting a backtesting procedure in a time window from 1980 to 2017 on a sample of over 9,000 assets. The work proves that the model proposed by the European Commission for the calculation of perfor-mance scenarios for category 2 PRIIPs (linear products) may not to be considered applicable for those products with a maturity less than one year (e.g. Forward/Future contracts with an underlying ex-change rate and expiration up to six months) when the calculated parameters are such that they do not allow the compliance of the bijectivity of the quantitles distribution function. Furthermore, the results of the backtesting show how the use of Cornish-Fisher's expansion to forecast future performance is compliant with the hypothesis of normality of returns and that between the two proposed variants. We have verified that the variant in which the underlying factors have a zero drift (described in the RTS modification proposals published on November 14th , 2016) is more reliable than the one that foresees a non-zero drift (described by the RTS of June 30th , 2016 and March 8th, 2017).

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Aquino & Francesco Rossi & Matteo Tesser, 2017. "Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-based Investments Products (PRIIP) - Scenari di performance con traiettorie alla Cornish-Fisher," Working Papers 11/2017, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:11/2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/wp2017n11.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:11/2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isverit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.