IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Forecast Performance of Threshold Autoregressive Models - A Monte Carlo Study

Threshold Autoregressive Models (TAR) along with other nonlinear time series models have attracted much attention in recent years in time series analysis. TAR models have been applied to a variety of time series. It has been reported that they have a good in sample fit but like many other non-linear time series models cannot improve out of sample forecast performance. Within a controlled simulation framework, we study the forecast performance under two types of non-linearity: shift in the mean and shift in the volatility of the process. We illustrate that estimation of the lag parameter and threshold value are crucial for forecast performance. Monte Carlo results show that TAR model performs much better than a Random Walk (RW) model; however, it provides no significant improvement over a linear Autoregressive (AR) model. Conclusions on the relative forecast performance of TAR models based on a single data set can be quite different than long run (Monte Carlo) results.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics in its series UWO Department of Economics Working Papers with number 9910.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 1998
Handle: RePEc:uwo:uwowop:9910
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Department of Economics, Reference Centre, Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Phone: 519-661-2111 Ext.85244
Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwo:uwowop:9910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.