IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uts/ppaper/2015-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How prevalent are post-completion audits in Australia

Author

Abstract

Numerous international studies have examined the practices employed by management at each of the component steps within the capital-budgeting decision. However, there are few references to any investigations of post-completion auditing (PCA) practices within the Australian setting. As a result, this paper seeks to take an initial step in addressing this deficit by proposing the following research questions: What is the prevalence of PCA implementation amongst Australian firms? Do Australian firms employ PCA in a formal rather than an ad hoc manner? Where Australian firms employ PCA in an ad hoc manner, why was this approach adopted? What are the disincentives to PCA implementation countenanced by Australian managers? Do contextual variables, such as firm size and industry type, affect the adoption of PCA in the Australian setting? While the current study surveys management from across the spectrum of industries, it gives additional focus to the mining sector. Given the economic importance of (and the magnitude of capital investment in) that sector over the last decade, the current study compares the adoption of the PCA process by firms in the mining sector against firms in other sectors in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Clarke & Kathleen Walsh & Jack Flanagan, 2015. "How prevalent are post-completion audits in Australia," Published Paper Series 2015-8, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2015-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=469182346697207;res=IELAPA
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2015-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Duncan Ford (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.