IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uts/ppaper/2014-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multivariate Monte-Carlo Simulation and Economic Valuation of Complex Financial Contracts: An Excel Based Implementation

Author

Abstract

The economic valuation of complex financial contracts is often done using Monte-Carlo simulation. We show how to implement this approach using Excel. We discuss Monte-Carlo evaluation for standard single asset European options and then demonstrate how the basic ideas may be extended to evaluate options with exotic multi-asset multi-period features. Single asset option evaluation becomes a special case. We use a typical Executive Stock Option to motivate the discussion, which we analyse using novel theory developed in our previous works. We demonstrate the simulation of the multivariate normal distribution and the multivariate Log-Normal distribution using the Cholesky Square Root of a covariance matrix for replicating the correlation structure in the multi-asset, multi period simulation required for estimating the economic value of the contract. We do this in the standard Black Scholes framework with constant parameters. Excel implementation provides many pedagogical merits due to its relative transparency and simplicity for students. This approach also has relevance to industry due to the widespread use of Excel by practitioners and for graduates who may desire to work in the finance industry. This allows students to be able to price complex financial contracts for which an analytic approach is intractable.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy J Kyng & Otto Konstandatos, 2014. "Multivariate Monte-Carlo Simulation and Economic Valuation of Complex Financial Contracts: An Excel Based Implementation," Published Paper Series 2014-6, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2014-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://epublications.bond.edu.au/ejsie/vol7/iss2/5/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2014-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Duncan Ford (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.