IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uto/dipeco/202301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender gap in high school choices: do achievements and peers play a role?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper focuses on the gendered choice of high school in the Italian context, where students select the type and subject-focus of their schools when they are around 13 years old (at a younger age than in most of the rest of the developed world). We explore the role of own ability and past performance in mathematics and Italian, the role of own position in the class ranking and the overall performance of girls and boys in the class. The main results show that individual ability by subject is an important determinant of high school choice and these effects vary with gender. Further, relative performance by subject also matter in educational choices, and the effects are similar for boys and girls. Lastly, we show that the gender gap in the choice of high school does not change once we have taken into consideration all these various mechanisms, and therefore the differences in choices are mostly unexplained, and likely to be related to cultural and social stereotypes, gender norms, and different perceptions of own abilities. These results call for policies that address stereotypes and prejudices.

Suggested Citation

  • Contini, Dalit & Di Tommaso, Maria Laura & Maccagnan, Anna & Mendolia, Silvia, 2023. "Gender gap in high school choices: do achievements and peers play a role?," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202301, University of Turin.
  • Handle: RePEc:uto:dipeco:202301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.est.unito.it/do/home.pl/Download?doc=/allegati/wp2023dip/wp_01_2023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uto:dipeco:202301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piero Cavaleri or Marina Grazioli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detorit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.