IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usu/wpaper/2001-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of life expectancies in U.S. counties

Author

Listed:
  • L. Israelsen
  • R. Israelsen
  • K. Israelsen

Abstract

There is a large variability in both female and male life expectancies by county in the U.S. We develop and test a model of the impact of demographic, economic, educational, social, and geographic factors on mean life expectancy by county for males and females born in 1990. We find that the percentage of population on rural farms, the percentage of married households, the level of education, the percentage speaking a language other than English at home, the percentage foreign-born, and county elevation have significant positive effects on life expectancy for both males and females; while the percentage of population below the poverty level, violent crime rate, population density, unemployment rate, and latitude have significant negative effects. Income has a nonlinear effect on life expectancy, but a negative impact on average female life expectancy. The percentage of the population reporting Northern European ancestry increases mean county life expectancy, while the percentage black or Native American reduces life expectancy. Finally, we identify state effects on mean county life expectancies, including the Mason-Dixon Effect, the Cowboy Effect, and—for females—the Rust Belt Effect.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Israelsen & R. Israelsen & K. Israelsen, 2001. "Determinants of life expectancies in U.S. counties," Working Papers 2001-17, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:usu:wpaper:2001-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.bus.usu.edu/RePEc/usu/pdf/ERI2001-17.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2001
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usu:wpaper:2001-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John Gilbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edusuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.