IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/612.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design-Based Treatment of Unit Nonresponse by the Calibration Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Fattorini

    ()

  • Sara Franceschi

    ()

  • Daniela Maffei

    ()

Abstract

The use of nonresponse calibration weighting is considered in a complete design-based frameworkto account for the cases in which nonresponse is a fixed characteristic of the units, just like the interest variable. Approximate expressions of design-based bias and variance of the calibration estimator are derived and some estimators of the sampling variance are proposed. The choice of auxiliary variables is discussed from theoretical and practical point of view. The results of an extensive simulation study demonstrate how the reliability of the procedure is mainly determined by the capability of selecting auxiliary variables in such a way that their relationship with the interest variable is similar for both the respondent and nonrespondent sub-populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Fattorini & Sara Franceschi & Daniela Maffei, 2011. "Design-Based Treatment of Unit Nonresponse by the Calibration Approach," Department of Economics University of Siena 612, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/612.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yves G. Berger & Chris J. Skinner, 2005. "A jackknife variance estimator for unequal probability sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 79-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    auxiliary variables; calibration estimator; variance estimator; simulation study.;

    JEL classification:

    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabrizio Becatti). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.