IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/use/tkiwps/2109.html

Have scale effects on cost margins of pension fund investment portfolios disappeared?

Author

Listed:
  • Jaap Bikker
  • J. Meringa

Abstract

Investment costs of pension funds are crucial for their returns. Consolidation in the pension fund market proceeds continuously, often with cost savings as the main argument. Unused economies of scale in the pension fund investment costs, however, have declined over the years to values close to zero, except for the very small pension funds. This paper investigates investment economies of scale in the Netherlands and pays special attention to the non-linear relationship between investment costs and sizes of pension funds. Furthermore, investment cost margins are disaggregated into three cost types and into six asset categories. Scale economies on investment cost still, ranging from 10% for the smaller pension funds to 5% for the largest ones. Performance fees are in particular paid for complex asset categories held by large pension funds. They show strong diseconomies of scale and reduce the traditional scale economy results for the entire portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaap Bikker & J. Meringa, 2021. "Have scale effects on cost margins of pension fund investment portfolios disappeared?," Working Papers 2109, Utrecht School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:2109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/419998/working_paper_no_710.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jacob Bikker & Jeroen Meringa, 2024. "Large pension funds do not invest more effectively than smaller pension funds," Working Papers 822, DNB.
    3. Jaap A. Bikker & Michiel van Leuvensteijn & Jeroen Meringa, 2025. "Competition among Dutch pension funds: is there any?," Working Papers 839, DNB.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:2109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eiruunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.