IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/use/tkiwps/1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of the language of instruction: How economics students in the Netherlands evaluate an English-taught Undergraduate Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Y.K. Grift
  • A.A. Meijer
  • F.H. van der Salm

Abstract

In this article student ratings of undergraduate level Economics courses are analysed on the basis of the aggregated results of end-of-term questionnaires. Two groups of students were involved, one of which was taught in Dutch and the other in English. In the analysis the influence was investigated of students’ assessments of both their own and their lecturers’ language proficiency, and of the didactic skills of the lecturers. Various differences between the judgements of the two groups were found; moreover, in course of time, some of the judgements evolved. The multivariate analysis shows that as students’ judgements of the didactic skills of their lecturers rose, so did the course ratings in general. Surprisingly, the judgements of neither the students’ own linguistic proficieny, nor that of the lecturers proved to be significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Y.K. Grift & A.A. Meijer & F.H. van der Salm, 2012. "The impact of the language of instruction: How economics students in the Netherlands evaluate an English-taught Undergraduate Programme," Working Papers 12-02, Utrecht School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:1202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/309825/12_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Muilwijk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eiruunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.