IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A Review of Retirement Income Policy Models

Public policymakers and program administrators often face decisions that impact the retirement incomes of individuals. An important question that these decision-makers may wish to address concerns the distributional impacts of the programmatic changes under consideration. Who (what population groups) would gain income and how much? Who would be unaffected? Who would lose and by how much? The question that this paper investigates is the extent to which computer models and associated policy analysis capability are available to provide decisionmakers with this kind of information. Specifically, the paper reviews a class of models that may be designated as retirement income policy models. The review is limited to existing models of programs within the U.S. retirement income system. The paper presents a general discussion of the components of such models. It describes features of models that are in the current portfolio and assesses components of those models. It furthermore presents examples of how the existing models might analyze two policy initiatives changing the "bend points" of the Social Security old-age and survivors insurance benefits and increasing the maximum allowable contributions to IRAs. The paper finds that the current capacity is not great, nor is it fully utilized. However, a foundation exists to be able to examine distributional impacts of retirement policy changes. Three concerns that need to be addressed now to assure that this foundation will be useful in the future are (1) assessing whether the existing modeling capacity is substantive enough and flexible enough to gear up in a short amount of time, (2) assessing whether decisionmakers will have adequate resources to support the necessary development and refinement of models, and (3) assuring that appropriate recent data sources are available to support the models.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1055&context=up_workingpapers
Download Restriction: This material is copyrighted. Permission is required to reproduce any or all parts.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Paper provided by W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in its series Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles with number 95-38.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:upj:weupjo:95-38
Contact details of provider: Postal: 300 S. Westnedge Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA
Phone: 1-269-343-5541
Fax: 1-269-343-7310
Web page: http://www.upjohn.org
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upj:weupjo:95-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.