IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/wp-2022-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Good for now but not forever: officials' perspectives on the relevance of the effectiveness agenda and the need for change

Author

Listed:
  • Rachael Calleja
  • Beata Cichocka

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the current effectiveness agenda—agreed during the 2011 Busan High Level Forum on Development Effectiveness—continues to define best practice in development amidst a rapidly changing development landscape. To do so, we surveyed officials from development agencies and partner countries to understand whether the effectiveness agenda remains relevant for officials who manage official development assistance (ODA) flows, and if not, how it should change.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachael Calleja & Beata Cichocka, 2022. "Good for now but not forever: officials' perspectives on the relevance of the effectiveness agenda and the need for change," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-140, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    • Handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2022-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/PDF/wp2022-140-officials-perspectives-relevance-effectiveness-agenda-need-for-change.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Taggart, 2022. "A Decade Since Busan: Towards Legitimacy or a ‘New Tyranny’ of Global Development Partnership?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 1459-1477, August.
    2. Sebastian Paulo & Janus, Heiner & Holzapfel, Sarah, 2017. "Thematic aid allocation: what are the benefits and risks?," Briefing Papers 19/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niels Keijzer & Stephan Klingebiel & Fabian Scholtes, 2020. "Promoting ownership in a “post‐aid effectiveness” world: Evidence from Rwanda and Liberia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 32-49, May.
    2. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101.
    3. R. Melis Baydag & Stephan Klingebiel, 2023. "Partner country selection between development narratives and self‐interests: A new method for analysing complex donor approaches," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 1199-1223, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2022-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Siméon Rapin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/widerfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.