IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unt/pbmpdd/pb126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What characterises a good green or sustainable finance taxonomy?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick John Martin

    (Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development Division, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific)

  • Anant Jha

    (Consultant, Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development Division, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific)

Abstract

Green and sustainable finance embodies a paradigm shift away from business as usual, and seeks to mobilise capital to simultaneously promote economic growth, environmental conservation and sustainable development. As such, it facilitates sustainable development and finances activities that have environmental benefits and are in line with the ambitions of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As the importance of green and sustainable finance grows considerably, market participants are increasingly seeking clear, consistent, comparable and reliable information about the green claims of different activities and instruments. This information is crucial to identifying activities and projects that are eligible for financing and comply with green and sustainable finance policies and regulations of the government. Developing green taxonomies can help reduce uncertainty for different stakeholders by providing a common language and framework for identifying and classifying environmentally sustainable activities and assets. This makes it easier for various actors, including central banks, governments and the private sector, to understand, regulate and finance green and sustainable activities. Green and sustainable taxonomies serve as instruments to guide capital allocation toward environmentally friendly and sustainable activities that align with broader environmental and sustainability objectives. They function as classification systems, identifying and categorising activities and investments as either “green” or “sustainable” contingent upon their alignment with specific environmental and sustainability goals and targets. The scope of the taxonomies can encompass diverse purposes, such as climate mitigation, adaptation, water management, circular economy practices, pollution control, and biodiversity conservation. This policy brief examines green and sustainable taxonomies and offers a concise set of recommendations on how to strengthen such taxonomies for policymakers and regulators. Its objective is to highlight fundamental principles and best practices, including a case study of Indonesia’s green taxonomy, and examine key features that characterise a good quality green or sustainable finance taxonomy. It also scrutinises the crucial design considerations for constructing a good quality green or sustainable finance taxonomy. These include clearly outlining objectives, defining users and scope, choosing the correct eligibility methodology and balancing the question of interoperability. The policy brief concludes by summarising potential pathways and recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick John Martin & Anant Jha, 2023. "What characterises a good green or sustainable finance taxonomy?," MPDD Policy Briefs PB126, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  • Handle: RePEc:unt:pbmpdd:pb126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unescap.org/kp/2023/what-characterises-good-green-or-sustainable-finance-taxonomy
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:pbmpdd:pb126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division, ESCAP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.