IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uno/wpaper/2005-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of the Corporate Cash Holding Decision

Author

Listed:
  • D'Mello, Ranjan

    (Wayne State University)

  • Krishnaswami, Sudha

    (University of New Orleans)

  • Larkin, Patrick J.

    (Fayetteville State University)

Abstract

We investigate the tradeoff theory as an explanation for how managers allocate cash to post-spin-off parent and subsidiary firms. Spin-offs provide an opportunity to examine the determinants of cash holdings free from the confounding effects of the pecking order theory. Our results indicate that difference in asset size, sales growth, research and development expenses, net working capital, and leverage significantly affect the difference in cash holdings of post-spin-off entities. These results suggest that cash holdings are decreasing in the ease of raising cash and availability of cash from internal sources, and are increasing in growth opportunities, asymmetric information levels, and financial distress costs.

Suggested Citation

  • D'Mello, Ranjan & Krishnaswami, Sudha & Larkin, Patrick J., 2005. "An Analysis of the Corporate Cash Holding Decision," Working Papers 2005-02, University of New Orleans, Department of Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:uno:wpaper:2005-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://louisdl.louislibraries.org/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/EFW&CISOPTR=34
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade-off theory; Spin-off; Cash holding;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uno:wpaper:2005-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Janet Murphy Crane (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deunous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.