IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/umc/wpaper/2511.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multiple Testing of Stochastic Monotonicity

Author

Abstract

We develop multiple testing methodology to assess the evidence that an outcome variable’s distribution (not just mean) is "stochastically increasing" in a covariate. Such a relationship holds globally if at each possible outcome value, the conditional CDF evaluated at that value is decreasing in the covariate. Rather than test that single global null hypothesis, we use multiple testing to separately evaluate each constituent conditional CDF inequality. Inverting our multiple testing procedure that controls familywise error rate, we construct "inner" and "outer" confidence sets for the true set of inequalities consistent with stochastic increasingness. Simulations show reasonable finite-sample properties. Empirically, we apply our methodology to study the education gradient in health. Practically, we provide code implementing our methodology and replicating our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wu & David M. Kaplan, 2025. "Multiple Testing of Stochastic Monotonicity," Working Papers 2511, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
  • Handle: RePEc:umc:wpaper:2511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IOdw7hg0hm7KcyPtzy7OqI5aWYhRvTrt/view?usp=sharing
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:umc:wpaper:2511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chao Gu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edumous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.