IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uma/periwp/wp232.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Undercounting the Underemployed: How Official Indicators Have Missed Millions of Underutilized Workers

Author

Listed:
  • David R. Howell

Abstract

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes six alternative indicators of labor underutilization, ranging from the long-term unemployed (U-1) and the standard unemployment rate (U-3) to a measure that includes all unemployed, involuntary part-time, and ‘marginally attached’ workers (U-6). These capture important dimensions of underutilization, but in recessions they miss millions of ‘displaced’ workers – those who are not counted in the U-6 measure but would have been working but for the economic downturn. For example, over the course of 2009 (2008:4 to 2009:4), employment fell by 5.8 million workers, but unemployed job losers and marginally attached (including discouraged) workers increased by less than 4.3 million, leaving over 1.5 million uncounted in the BLS underutilization rates. These include those who no longer qualify as ‘marginally attached’ or have simply disappeared from the data (e.g., workers returning to Mexico). If we take into account the growth in the working age population and apply a 2007 employment rate of 63%, the number of missing underutilized workers in 2009:4 increases to about 3.1 million.

Suggested Citation

  • David R. Howell, 2010. "Undercounting the Underemployed: How Official Indicators Have Missed Millions of Underutilized Workers," Working Papers wp232, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  • Handle: RePEc:uma:periwp:wp232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://per.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_201-250/WP232.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meir Russ, 2017. "The Trifurcation of the Labor Markets in the Networked, Knowledge-Driven, Global Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 672-703, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uma:periwp:wp232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Judy Fogg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/permaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.