IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uma/perips/snap_report.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Consequences of Cutting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Thompson
  • Heidi Garrett-Peltier

Abstract

The importance of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in combating poverty in our country by alleviating hunger was driven home anew during the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and the subsequent tepid economic recovery. The program is credited with preventing a dramatic increase in hunger and food insecurity in spite of the historically high levels of unemployment and under-employment throughout the Great Recession. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program distributed $72 billion worth of benefits to nearly 45 million Americans in fiscal year 2011. The program also plays an important role in sustaining demand for groceries provided by businesses in communities around the country. This analysis finds that each $1 billion dollars spent by recipients enables nearly 14,000 Americans to find or keep their jobs. With long-term unemployment still high, and with overall unemployment expected to drop only slowly for several more years, cutting SNAP is likely to do significant harm to millions of families and workers. But there is a reasonable probability that such cuts will be proposed in the FY 2013 House leadership budget proposal. If cuts are proposed, this study offers policymakers a tool to estimate the employment consequences that will result. The study estimates that:> Each $1 billion reduction in SNAP eliminates 13,718 jobs> A ten percent reduction in the size of SNAP would cause more than 96,000 job losses> These losses would be particularly strong in food-related industries, which would lose as many as 11,000 jobs under a 10 percent cut to the SNAP program> Job losses will likely have the greatest impact on younger workers, since they account for a disproportionate share of workers in food-related industries

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Thompson & Heidi Garrett-Peltier, 2012. "The Economic Consequences of Cutting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program," Published Studies snap_report, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  • Handle: RePEc:uma:perips:snap_report
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/published_study/snap_report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uma:perips:snap_report. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Judy Fogg) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Judy Fogg to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/permaus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.