IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uma/perips/peri_newhaven_march2011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pushing Working Families into Poverty: Assessing the New Haven Plan to Privatize the Public Schools’ Custodial Services

Author

Listed:
  • Jeannette Wicks-Lim

Abstract

The City of New Haven is considering outsourcing its public school custodial services to a private firm. Outsourcing would cut the cost of services in half, saving the city $8.1 million, or 19% percent of the deficit. But in this analysis of the impacts of the cuts, Jeannette Wicks-Lim finds that the cost of that savings would be severe: the family of a custodian who continues to work in the New Haven Public Schools under the proposed contract would simply no longer be able to make ends meet. Wicks-Lim shows that under the proposed contract, the average custodian would experience a 54 percent fall in total household income, from $68,000 to $31,000. At this level of household income, most families would be eligible for the subsidized programs such as SNAP (formerly Food Stamps) and HUSKY (Connecticut’s Medicaid program), merely shifting costs from the city to state and federal governments. Even taking on second part-time job would only likely raise this household income to $42,000 —still $8,500 short of the $50,543 a household of three would need to even meet its basic needs. She also demonstrates the degree to which the proposed privatization unfairly places the burden of balancing city budgets on a small population. By privitizing these jobs, the city would effectively force the 186 lower-to-middle-income NHPS custodians and their families to bear the burden for fully 19% of the city’s projected budget deficit. Yet, these families represent less than one-half of one-percent of the 46,000 households in New Haven.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeannette Wicks-Lim, 2011. "Pushing Working Families into Poverty: Assessing the New Haven Plan to Privatize the Public Schools’ Custodial Services," Published Studies peri_newhaven_march2011, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  • Handle: RePEc:uma:perips:peri_newhaven_march2011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/published_study/PERI_NewHaven_March2011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uma:perips:peri_newhaven_march2011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Judy Fogg) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Judy Fogg to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/permaus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.