IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2026-16.html

Perception of (multi)risk in forest: a review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Clémence Barrey
  • Marielle Brunette
  • David Shanafelt

Abstract

Forests provide a wide range of goods and services that are threatened by natural disturbances, which represent one of thegreatest threats to forests worldwide. Climate change increases their frequency and intensity, creating a multirisk context in which different hazards act in combination. How forest owners perceive these interconnected risks is crucial for the implementation of adaptation strategies and the development of relevant public policy. In this article, we conduct a literature review examining how existing articles address risk perception in forests, particularly in relation to multirisk. Our review focuses exclusively on research articles written in english, with at least one keyword for risk perception, forests, and risk. More specifically, we examine whether the methodologies used to study isolated risks remain relevant when considering multirisk. Our main conclusion is that no study directly addresses the perception of multirisk in forests, as almost all the articles consider risks in isolation. Methodologically, most studies rely on surveys conducted among professionals, forest owners, or local residents. Very few articles are theoretically grounded or based on economic models. In addition, the literature reveals a lack of diversity in both the risks and countries studied, with the majority of papers focusing on wildfires in the United States. Therefore, understanding the perception of multirisk in forests remains a broad field for future research, both theoretically- particularly in economics- and empirically, through further exploration of underrepresented countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Clémence Barrey & Marielle Brunette & David Shanafelt, 2026. "Perception of (multi)risk in forest: a review of the literature," Working Papers of BETA 2026-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2026-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2026/2026-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2026-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bestrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.