IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

L’innovation envisagée comme un processus de résolution de contradictions techniques, organisationnelles et cognitives

  • Christophe Belleval
  • Christophe Lerch
Registered author(s):

    La conception innovante est considérée dans ce papier comme la résultante d'un processus de résolution dialectique de problèmes, qui débouche sur un ensemble d'arbitrages ou de contradictions. De ces dernières, découlent soit un blocage qui induit la remise en cause des objectifs initiaux, soit une solution inventive, i.e.: une innovation de rupture. Nous distinguons trois dimensions qui interagissent dans ce processus: la technique, la cognition et l'organisation. Dans une première partie, nous étudions d'un point de vue théorique chacune de ces dimensions, tout en montrant quelles sont leurs possibles interactions. Dans une deuxième partie, nous relatons une étude de cas vécue au sein d'une agence spatiale: la remise en cause d'une innovation de rupture programmée, que nous interprétons au travers de notre corpus théorique.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg in its series Working Papers of BETA with number 2010-27.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2010-27
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    PEGE. 61, Aven. de la Forêt-Noire 67000 Strasbourg

    Phone: +33 3 68 85 20 69
    Fax: +33 3 68 85 20 70
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2010-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.