IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2002-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comment évaluer l’amélioration du bien etre indivduel issue d’une modification de la qualité du service d’élimination des déchets ménagers ?

Author

Listed:
  • Valentine HEINTZ

Abstract

Le service d’élimination des déchets ménagers présente divers risques environnementaux et sanitaires. Si, en accord avec la législation actuelle, nous supposons que le recyclage constitue la moins mauvaise des voies d’élimination, développer la collecte sélective améliore la qualité de ce service. L’individu bénéficie alors d’une amélioration de son bien-être individuel. L’objectif de cet papier est de montrer que la méthode d’évaluation contingente demeure une piste intéressante pour évaluer ce surplus.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentine HEINTZ, 2002. "Comment évaluer l’amélioration du bien etre indivduel issue d’une modification de la qualité du service d’élimination des déchets ménagers ?," Working Papers of BETA 2002-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2002-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.beta-umr7522.fr/productions/publications/2002/2002-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Parimutuel betting; Sequential decisions; Favorite-longshot bias; Non-expected utility under risk.;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2002-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bestrfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.