IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-66984.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

It's Magic. It's Disney !Do themeparks deserve their succes?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Gothelf
  • Denis Herbaux
  • Vincenzo Verardi

Abstract

This paper focuses on cultural goods such as entertainment goods, especially theme parks. We have built a dataset regrouping the largest parks in Europe and looked at the relation between the costs and the quality of a theme park, thereby trying to estimate if a theme park deserves its attendance with respect to its characteristics such as quality and price. We tackle the issue that both the price and the attendance are highly correlated with each other guessing that in fact both the price and the attendance level can be explained by the sum of the characteristics of these parks. So we run two separate hedonic robust regressions on price and attendance to find out if there are outliers in terms of these two variables. To do this, we identify outliers in the space of explanatory variables using the Mahalanobis distance. From the detection, we downweight the outliers and the system we regress allows for the possibility of a link between both equations (SURE). Moreover, we propose a new typology for this cultural good.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Gothelf & Denis Herbaux & Vincenzo Verardi, "undated". "It's Magic. It's Disney !Do themeparks deserve their succes?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/66984, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/66984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/66984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.