IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-409068.html

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling pressure compared to pulmonary artery catheter in mechanically ventilated patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Margherita Calicchia
  • Valeria Bianchi
  • Alberto Calabrese
  • Agatha Roth
  • Vincent Labbé
  • Filippo Annoni
  • Fabio Silvio Taccone
  • Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian

Abstract

Background Estimating left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP) is a crucial component of hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. While non-invasive techniques such as Doppler echocardiography have been validated in non-critical populations, their application in mechanically ventilated patients remains less well-documented. Objective This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in predicting LVFP, as assessed by pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies focusing on critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU (Population-P). The intervention (I) was the assessment of LVFP using transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. The comparator (C) was PAOP measurement obtained via a pulmonary artery catheter. The primary outcomes (O) included the accuracy of echocardiographic measurements and their correlation with PAOP. We searched three databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Embase), screened relevant articles, synthesized the data, assessed study quality using standard tools, and graded the level of evidence with GRADE criteria. A meta-analysis was performed for comparable findings. Results Of 3596 studies initially identified, 18 prospective studies (n = 696 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with 8 studies (n = 342 patients) included in the meta-analysis. All studies featured small sample sizes (less than 100 patients). Six studies evaluated E/A ratios, and four E/E’ ratios. in relation to PAOP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve ranged from 0.69 to 0.83 for E/A and from 0.60 to 0.91 for lateral E/E’ in predicting PAOP ≥ 18 mmHg. Both E/A and lateral E/E’ showed a correlation with PAOP, with pooled correlation coefficients of 0.48 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.48−0.58) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52−0.92), respectively. Study quality ranged from low to high and heterogeneity was high the overall level of evidence was deemed very low. Conclusions Doppler echocardiography shows potential for assessing LVFP in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. However, limitations such as small sample sizes and study heterogeneity, including the use of different PAOP cut-off values to define elevated LVFP, highlight the need for further research to strengthen its role in this setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Margherita Calicchia & Valeria Bianchi & Alberto Calabrese & Agatha Roth & Vincent Labbé & Filippo Annoni & Fabio Silvio Taccone & Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, 2026. "Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling pressure compared to pulmonary artery catheter in mechanically ventilated patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/409068, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/409068
    Note: SCOPUS: re.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/409068/1/doi_392712.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/409068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.