IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-399597.html

Use of intravenous lipid emulsions in drug-induced toxicities: a 2025 narrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Gauthier Nendumba
  • Sydney Blackman
  • Nathan De Lissnyder
  • Marine Cillis
  • Patrick P.M. Honore

Abstract

Intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE) were first proposed in 1998 as a treatment for bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest. Since then, their use has expanded to include poisonings by various lipophilic drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, and antipsychotics. This 2025 narrative review explores the evolving pathophysiological mechanisms of ILE therapy, including the lipid sink and lipid shuttle theories, as well as non-scavenging cardiotonic effects such as membrane stabilization, mitochondrial support, and modulation of vascular tone. It summarizes recent findings from randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, animal models, and case registries. While clinical trials demonstrate potential benefits—particularly in tramadol, clozapine, and organophosphate poisonings—mortality reduction remains unproven, and evidence is limited by study heterogeneity and low methodological quality. Adverse effects, although rare, include acute pancreatitis, interference with laboratory testing, and fat overload syndrome, especially at high infusion volumes. Current guidelines recommend ILEs as a first-line treatment for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and as a second-line option in life-threatening poisonings involving other lipophilic agents. However, significant uncertainty remains regarding optimal indications, dosing strategies, and long-term safety. High-quality, multicenter studies and updated registries are needed to refine these recommendations and clarify the role of ILEs in clinical toxicology.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauthier Nendumba & Sydney Blackman & Nathan De Lissnyder & Marine Cillis & Patrick P.M. Honore, 2025. "Use of intravenous lipid emulsions in drug-induced toxicities: a 2025 narrative review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/399597, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/399597
    Note: SCOPUS: re.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/399597/1/doi_383241.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/399597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.