IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-391341.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should We Let Employers Decide Who Can Return to Work After Being Sick? Lessons From Belgium's Reintegration Trajectories

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Ligato
  • Sébastien Fontenay
  • Ilan Tojerow

Abstract

Research highlights the benefits of workplace accommodations for job retention, yet many eligible workers lack adequate support. Existing studies focus primarily on worker-side incentives, leaving employer-side factors largely unexplored. This paper examines the impact of employer discretion in selecting Disability Insurance (DI) recipients for Reintegration Trajectories (RTs), a program aimed at promoting work resumption through workplace adaptations and employer involvement. Exploiting a 2018 policy change in Belgium, we use a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) to estimate its causal effects. Employer-selected participants are 13.1 percentage points less likely to resume work and 19.7 percentage points more likely to remain in DI. Employers tend to select older participants with longer disability durations, often leading to unsuccessful trajectories. In contrast, an event study shows that trajectories initiated by the medical advisor significantly accelerate work resumption among DI recipients.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Ligato & Sébastien Fontenay & Ilan Tojerow, "undated". "Should We Let Employers Decide Who Can Return to Work After Being Sick? Lessons From Belgium's Reintegration Trajectories," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/391341, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/391341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/391341/3/PosterSOLE2025.pdf
    File Function: Poster
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/391341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.